Role of 5-HT1A Receptor in Vilazodone-Mediated Suppression of L-DOPA-Induced Dyskinesia and Increased Responsiveness to Cortical Input in Striatal Medium Spiny Neurons in an Animal Model of Parkinson's Disease.

L-DOPA therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) is limited due to emerging L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Research has identified abnormal dopamine release from serotonergic (5-HT) terminals contributing to this dyskinesia. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or 5-HT receptor (5-HTr) agonists can regulate 5-HT activity and attenuate dyskinesia, but they often also produce a loss of the antiparkinsonian efficacy of L-DOPA. We investigated vilazodone, a novel multimodal 5-HT agent with SSRI and 5-HTr1A partial agonist properties, for its potential to reduce dyskinesia without interfering with the prokinetic effects of L-DOPA, and underlying mechanisms. We assessed vilazodone effects on L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (abnormal involuntary movements, AIMs) and aberrant responsiveness to corticostriatal drive in striatal medium spiny neurons (MSNs) measured with in vivo single-unit extracellular recordings, in the 6-OHDA rat model of PD. Vilazodone (10 mg/kg) suppressed all subtypes (axial, limb, orolingual) of AIMs induced by L-DOPA (5 mg/kg) and the increase in MSN responsiveness to cortical stimulation (shorter spike onset latency). Both the antidyskinetic effects and reversal in MSN excitability by vilazodone were inhibited by the 5-HTr1A antagonist WAY-100635, demonstrating a critical role for 5-HTr1A in these vilazodone actions. Our results indicate that vilazodone may serve as an adjunct therapeutic for reducing dyskinesia in patients with PD.

Cost-effectiveness of vortioxetine compared with levomilnacipran and vilazodone in patients with major depressive disorder switching from an initial antidepressant.

Introduction: Many patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not achieve remission with their first antidepressant (AD), resulting in a high burden due to treatment failure. Vortioxetine is a valid treatment option for patients with MDD only partially responding to their first AD. Characterization of vortioxetine's potential benefits versus other approved treatments is important. Areas covered: The cost-effectiveness of vortioxetine, including cognitive outcomes, was modeled in comparison with levomilnacipran and vilazodone for patients switched to these medications after inadequate responses to a first AD. Expert opinion: Vortioxetine was associated with incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains versus levomilnacipran (0.008) or vilazodone (0.009). Vortioxetine was dominant versus levomilnacipran and cost-effective versus vilazodone (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER],33,829 USD/QALY). In sensitivity analyses using residual cognitive dysfunction rates (vortioxetine, 49%; levomilnacipran, 58%, and vilazodone, 64%), incremental QALY gains for vortioxetine versus levomilnacipran (0.0085) or vilazodone (0.0109) were found. Vortioxetine remained dominant versus levomilnacipran and cost-effective versus vilazodone (ICER, 27,633 USD/QALY). ICER reduction was found with cognition outcomes inclusion. This model provides additional support for considering vortioxetine for patients requiring a switch of MDD treatments, although its conclusions are limited by the data available for inclusion. Additional research and real-world trials are needed to confirm the findings.

Evaluation of dose and outcomes for pediatric vilazodone ingestions.

BACKGROUND: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) exposures among children younger than 6 years of age are generally well tolerated. Vilazodone is an SSRI with partial agonism at the 5-HT1A receptor with demonstrated clinical efficacy for depression whose off-label usage is likely to increase. Recent evidence suggests that unintentional ingestion of vilazodone in children under 6 years old is associated with more severe clinical effects than other SSRIs. We chose to evaluate dose and outcomes for pediatric vilazodone ingestions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of single-substance exposures associated with vilazodone among children younger than 6 years of age from 2011 through 2016 was conducted using data from the National Poison Data System. RESULTS: During 2011-2016, 753 vilazodone ingestions among children <6 years old were reported to US poison control centers. A near majority (49.0%, n = 369) experienced one or more clinical effects. The dose ingested was reported for 596 children (79%). The median dose associated with major effects was 50.0mg (Mean: 106.0) compared with 40.0mg (Mean 81.1) for moderate effects. Half (50.0%) of children with a major effect and 54.0% with a moderate effect ingested ≤40 mg of vilazodone. As the dose of vilazodone ingested increased, the proportions of exposures admitted to a healthcare facility (HCF) (p < .001) and with serious outcomes (p < .001) both increased. Children ≤2 years had higher proportions of HCF admission (33.8% vs 23.1%) and serious outcomes (27.0% vs 17.7%) than children 3-5 years of age. Clinical effects, such as coma, seizures, ataxia, and hallucinations/delusions, were observed among children ingesting doses of vilazodone as low as 10 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to vilazodone poses a unique and potentially serious threat to children <6 years of age. Children in this age group who are exposed to vilazodone should be evaluated promptly in a clinical setting. Off-label use of vilazodone in children under 6 years should be discouraged until further research is conducted regarding its safety in this population.

Efficacy and tolerability of different doses of three new antidepressants for treating major depressive disorder: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

In last decade, the US FDA has approved three new antidepressants: vortioxetine, levomilnacipran, and vilazodone. Many studies have researched the effects of these antidepressants on major depressive disorder (MDD), but they have not determined the optimum dosage. This meta-analysis investigated the efficacies of these three drugs at different dosages in the treatment of MDD. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, psycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched to identify relevant literature. The primary outcomes were efficacy [quantified as the change from baseline in total score on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)] and tolerability (discontinuations due to adverse events). The effect size was quantified as the weighted mean difference for continuous data and the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data. Overall 22 studies were included. The changes in the MADRS total score were significantly higher for vortioxetine at 5, 10, 20, and 10-20 mg/day than for placebo. The tolerability was significantly worse for 20 mg/day vortioxetine than for placebo (RR = 1.84, 95% confidence interval = 1.13 to 3.02). In addition, increasing the dosage improved the efficacy of vortioxetine but worsened the tolerability. Levomilnacipran and vilazodone at any dosage produced a significantly higher mean change from baseline in the MADRS total score and a worse tolerability than for placebo. In conclusion, considering both efficacy and tolerability, 10 mg/day vortioxetine might be optimal for the treatment of MDD. The long-term efficacy and safety of vortioxetine needed to be investigated, and more studies of levomilnacipran and vilazodone are needed to define their optimal dosages.

A randomized controlled pilot trial of vilazodone for adult separation anxiety disorder.

BACKGROUND: Separation anxiety disorder was recently recognized by fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders as a diagnosis in adults, but no publications to date have characterized a sample of patients seeking treatment for adult separation anxiety disorder (ASAD) or assessed treatment efficacy. We hypothesized that vilazodone, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and serotonin 1a (5HT1a ) receptor partial agonist, would have efficacy in ASAD, because SSRIs have appeared efficacious in children with mixed diagnoses including separation anxiety disorder and in animal models of separation anxiety. METHODS: In this pilot study, 24 adults (ages 18-60) with a principal diagnosis of ASAD were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with vilazodone (n = 13) or placebo (n = 11). Outcome was assessed by an independent evaluator and self-ratings, and analyzed with mixed effect models. RESULTS: This sample was predominantly female (67%), with comorbid psychiatric disorders (58%), and adult onset of separation anxiety disorder (62%). Response rates at week 12 did not differ significantly between groups. Across all time points, the vilazodone group evidenced greater improvement on the Structured Clinical Interview for Separation Anxiety Symptoms (P = .026) and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (P = .011), and trends toward greater improvement on the Adult Separation Anxiety Questionnaire (P = .054) and the Clinical Global Impression-Change Scale (P = .086), all with large between-group effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate feasibility of a clinical trial in ASAD, and they suggest that vilazodone may have efficacy in the treatment of ASAD and warrants further study.

Identification and characterization of vilazodone metabolites in rats and microsomes by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry.

RATIONALE: Vilazodone is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) used for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). An extensive literature search found few reports on the in vivo and in vitro metabolism of vilazodone. Therefore, we report a comprehensive in vivo and in vitro metabolic identification and structural characterization of vilazodone using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC/Q-TOF/MS/MS) and in silico toxicity study of the metabolites. METHODS: To identify in vivo metabolites of vilazodone, blood, urine and faeces samples were collected at different time intervals starting from 0 h to 48 h after oral administration of vilazodone to Sprague-Dawley rats. The in vitro metabolism study was conducted with human liver microsomes (HLM) and rat liver microsomes (RLM). The samples were prepared using an optimized sample preparation approach involving protein precipitation followed by solid-phase extraction. The metabolites have been identified and characterized by using LC/ESI-MS/MS. RESULTS: A total of 12 metabolites (M1-M12) were identified in in vivo and in vitro matrices and characterized by LC/ESI-MS/MS. The majority of the metabolites were observed in urine, while a few metabolites were present in faeces and plasma. Two metabolites were observed in the in vitro study. A semi-quantitative study based on percentage counts shows that metabolites M11, M6 and M8 were observed in higher amounts in urine, faeces and plasma, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The structures of all the 12 metabolites were elucidated by using LC/ESI-MS/MS. The study suggests that vilazodone was metabolized via hydroxylation, dihydroxylation, glucuronidation, oxidative deamination, dealkylation, dehydrogenation and dioxidation. All the metabolites were screened for toxicity using an in silico tool.

Novel Vilazodone-Tacrine Hybrids as Potential Multitarget-Directed Ligands for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease Accompanied with Depression: Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation.

Depression is one of the most frequent psychiatric complications of Alzheimer's disease (AD), affecting up to 50% of the patients. A novel series of hybrid molecules were designed and synthesized by combining the pharmacophoric features of vilazodone and tacrine as potential multitarget-directed ligands for the treatment of AD with depression. In vitro biological assays were conducted to evaluate the compounds; among the 30 hybrids, compound 1e showed relatively balanced profiles between acetylcholinesterase inhibition (IC50 = 3.319 ± 0.708 µM), 5-HT1A agonist (EC50 = 107 ± 37 nM), and 5-HT reuptake inhibition (IC50 = 76.3 ± 33 nM). Compound 1e displayed tolerable hepatotoxicity and moderate hERG inhibition activity, and could penetrate the blood-brain barrier in vivo. Furthermore, an oral intake of 30 mg/kg 1e·HCl could significantly improve the cognitive function of scopolamine-induced amnesia mice and alleviate the depressive symptom in tail suspension test. The effectivity of 1e validates the rationality of our design strategy.

Efficacy and tolerability of vilazodone for major depressive disorder: evidence from phase III/IV randomized controlled trials.

Vilazodone is a new molecule approved for major depressive disorder (MDD). This report focuses on the efficacy and tolerability of vilazodone for MDD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched. A total of 1,930 patients from four trials were included. A significant improvement in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score was seen as early as week 2 (P<0.01) in vilazodone-treated patients. The results showed a higher rate of MADRS response with vilazodone compared with placebo (P<0.001). There were also greater improvements in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety as well as the Clinical Global Impressions (severity of illness and improvement of illness) scores from baseline in vilazodone-treated patients compared to placebo patients (P<0.001). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were higher with vilazodone than placebo (P=0.0002). The most common adverse events of vilazodone were vomiting, nausea, diarrhea, insomnia, somnolence, dizziness, and dry mouth (P<0.05). Treatment-related effects on sexual function were mild compared to placebo in men (P=0.03). In conclusion, 40 mg/day of vilazodone had a rapid onset of response and showed good improvement in anxiety symptoms as well as good tolerability during short-term treatment (8-10 weeks) for MDD. Further studies should focus on the efficacy and tolerability of vilazodone over a longer duration and should utilize active comparators.

Efficacy and Safety of Vilazodone in Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Flexible-Dose Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vilazodone as an acute treatment for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Vilazodone is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, flexible-dose study conducted from May 2013-March 2014. Adult patients (18-70 years, inclusive) who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for GAD were randomized (1:1) to placebo or vilazodone 20-40 mg/d for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment. Primary and secondary efficacy parameters were change from baseline to week 8 in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) total score and in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total score, respectively, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures approach on a modified intent-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Efficacy analyses were based on 400 patients (placebo = 200, vilazodone = 200); 76% completed the study (placebo = 81%, vilazodone = 71%). The least squares mean difference (95% CI) in total score change from baseline to week 8 was statistically significant for vilazodone versus placebo on the HARS (-2.20 [-3.72 to -0.68]; P = .0048) and on the SDS (-1.89 [-3.52 to -0.26]; P = .0236). Treatment-emergent adverse events reported in ≥ 5% of vilazodone patients and at least twice the rate of placebo were nausea, diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, delayed ejaculation, and erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Statistically significant differences in favor of vilazodone 20-40 mg/d versus placebo were seen on all measures of anxiety and functional impairment in patients with GAD. Vilazodone was generally well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were noted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01844115.

Vilazodone in patients with generalized anxiety disorder: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study.

Vilazodone is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and a 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist that is approved for treatment of major depressive disorder in adults in the USA and Mexico. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vilazodone for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) were investigated in a clinical trial (NCT01766401 ClinicalTrials.gov). Participants (18-70 years, inclusive) who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., text revision, criteria for GAD were randomized (1:1) to placebo or flexible-dose vilazodone (20-40 mg/day) for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment. Primary and secondary efficacy parameters were changes from baseline to week 8 in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety and Sheehan Disability Scale total scores, respectively. Analysis was based on a mixed-effects model for repeated measures approach on the intent-to-treat population. The intent-to-treat population comprised 395 patients (placebo=197, vilazodone=198); 77% completed the study. The least squares mean difference in change from baseline to week 8 in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety total score was statistically significant for vilazodone versus placebo [-1.50 (-2.96, -0.04), P=0.0438]. The mean change from baseline to week 8 in the Sheehan Disability Scale total score for vilazodone versus placebo was not statistically significant. Adverse events were reported in 60% of placebo-treated and 83% of vilazodone-treated patients. This was a positive clinical trial of 20-40 mg/day vilazodone versus placebo in the treatment of GAD.

Influence of CYP3A4 induction/inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of vilazodone in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: Vilazodone is a serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 5-HT1A partial agonist approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults. Vilazodone seems to be metabolized primarily by the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 isozyme and non-CYP-mediated pathways; concomitant use of drugs that affect CYP3A4 activity could potentially alter systemic exposure to vilazodone. The present studies evaluated whether CYP3A4 inhibition (study 1) or induction (study 2) affected the pharmacokinetics of vilazodone. METHODS: Participants were healthy adult volunteers. Study 1 was conducted in 2 parts and evaluated the pharmacokinetics of single-dose vilazodone administered with multiple-dose (200 mg once daily) ketoconazole, a CYP3A4 inhibitor. Part 1 was an open-label pharmacokinetic assessment of a single 5-mg vilazodone dose with or without ketoconazole. Part 2 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study comparing vilazodone pharmacokinetics after a single 10-mg dose alone or co-administered with ketoconazole or placebo. Study 2 was an open-label, multiple-dose, single-sequence study evaluating the effect of steady-state carbamazepine, a CYP3A4 substrate and inducer, on the pharmacokinetics of steady-state vilazodone (40 mg once daily). Primary pharmacokinetic parameters for both studies were AUC and Cmax for vilazodone. Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction was concluded if the 90% CIs of the ratio of vilazodone plus the CYP3A4 inhibitor/inducer relative to vilazodone alone (or plus placebo) for AUC and Cmax were within the 80% to 125% range. Subject-reported and investigator-identified adverse events (AEs), laboratory values, vital signs, and 12-lead ECG parameters were recorded. FINDINGS: In study 1/parts 1 and 2 (n = 15 and 22 enrolled, respectively), mean vilazodone AUC increased 42% and 51%, respectively, in the presence of ketoconazole (expected to be at steady state) versus vilazodone alone (part 1) or with placebo (part 2). The upper limit of the 90% CIs for the vilazodone AUC and Cmax geometric mean ratios exceeded 125%. In study 2 (n = 30 enrolled), co-administration of vilazodone and the carbamazepine extended-release formulation decreased mean steady-state vilazodone exposure ~45%, and the 90% CIs for the vilazodone AUC and Cmax geometric mean ratios were not within the range of 80% to 125%. In both studies, most AEs were of mild intensity, and gastrointestinal AEs predominated. IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest that up to a 50% decrease of vilazodone dosage should be considered when it is given in combination with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors; conversely, increasing the vilazodone dosage up to a maximum of 80 mg/d should be considered when it is given in combination with strong CYP3A4 inducers. (Study registration numbers: SB-659746/029; VLZ-PK-02.).